> > I've noticed some udebs require on libslang.so.1, while the cdebconf
> > slang frontend require libslang.so.1-UTF8. Should all udeb programs
> > and libraries link with UTF8 versions of libraries, or should we leave
> > it to the package maintainers?
>
> I was kind of hoping that we would be able to do away with the non-UTF8
> libraries altogether during the sarge development cycle. Everything
> should be linking against the UTF8 versions in absence of any compelling
> reason to do differently.
me also thinks that should be the case, except for an oddball
(whiptail.so, which provides utf-8 verison and non-utf8 version),
or unless the packages doesn't work with utf-8 version (which is
rather unlikely, or broken).
regards,
junichi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
