On 6 Oct 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > I guess the best choice (unless one has very good reasons) would be > the currently running kernel. We know that that one _is_ working.
Doesn't the installer kernel have many drivers (e.g. audio) removed to keep it small? > Type of pu is easy. Number of cpus is tricky. Unless you use a SMP > enabled kernel you don't see the extra cpus in /proc/cpuinfo. Is there a reason not to use an SMP kernel in the installer? I've never tried to see if it works on uniprocessor machines. --Andre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
