On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:04:22PM -0700, Andre Lehovich wrote: > On 6 Oct 2003, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > I guess the best choice (unless one has very good reasons) would be > > the currently running kernel. We know that that one _is_ working. > > Doesn't the installer kernel have many drivers (e.g. > audio) removed to keep it small?
It does have many drivers compiled as modules, but it's not specific to the installer. > > Type of pu is easy. Number of cpus is tricky. Unless you use a SMP > > enabled kernel you don't see the extra cpus in /proc/cpuinfo. > > Is there a reason not to use an SMP kernel in the installer? > I've never tried to see if it works on uniprocessor > machines. They work, but are bigger and slower on uniprocessor machines, which are more common. -- Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
