Your message dated Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:36:04 GMT
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2003 20:12:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 28 15:12:14 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p50832785.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (bougon.org) [80.131.39.133]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19hELu-0003Zo-00; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 15:12:14 -0500
Received: by bougon.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 727DA1FE92; Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:15:10 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Robert CHERAMY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: installation: buffer overflow when choosing a hostnqme (install option :
network)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.18
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 22:15:09 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: installation
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-07-28
Severity: normal
(sarge-i386-netinst.iso downloaded today)
I choosed to install with the "net" option. While giving the hostname, I
tried to give a domain name (by the way I did not found a way to give
it) by entering it in the hostname : "topaze.bougon.org".
I got the message telling me the name was incorrect, but after that, the
default proposed hostname looked like a buffer overflow to me :
[default = debian xze.bougon.org "*
go]>
* is a white square but I can't reproduce it...
Hope it helps...
--
tibob
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 203245-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2003 12:39:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 25 06:36:07 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ni-mail2.dna.utvinternet.net [194.46.8.26]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AOcQI-000574-00; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 06:36:07 -0600
Received: from utvinternet.com (unverified [194.46.8.35]) by
ni-mail2.dna.utvinternet.net
(Vircom SMTPRS 3.0.273) with SMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:36:05 +0000
From: "Alastair McKinstry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:36:04 GMT
Subject: closing
X-Mailer: DMailWeb Web to Mail Gateway 2.8a, http://netwinsite.com/top_mail.htm
Message-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-User-Info: 217.163.5.253
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_99 autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20
X-Spam-Level: *
This bug has been fixed in netcfg for several releases.
Closing,
- Alastair
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
