On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 02:33:46PM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 05:08:05PM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > > - miBoot's freeness is unclear to me ATM. I guess providing a boot > > floppy in the contrib/non-free section would be much work for a > > few OldWorld users that would probably be able to create it > > themselves if we provide them with detailed instructions, so it's > > the way I'll take if no miracle happens.
> I've finally managed to get a friend unsit the bootx distribution for > me. It contains the source code and a GPL, which is good news. However, > I guess it'll be hard to build miBoot with a free toolchain. > Would a contrib package be an acceptable build-dependency for d-i images ? Does any part of miboot actually have to be included in the d-i build? I thought miboot was simply the bootloader, that would need to be pointed at the d-i images to be booted? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
