On Wed, 2004-07-07, at 23:56:08 +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: > On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 01:19:39AM +0200, Anders Lennartsson wrote: > > drive. I have not tested to continue the install from there. > > I'm not a SATA export, but AFAIK this is normal and expected. I agree. Although I kind of expected this kernel to recognize the disk as SCSI as the Debian 2.4.26 does include the libata patch. Perhaps 2.4.27 will sort this out.
snip > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: PCI: Enabling device 00:1f.1 (0005 -> > > 0007) > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ICH5: chipset revision 2 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ICH5: not 100% native mode: will probe > > irqs later > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide0: BM-DMA at 0xfc00-0xfc07, BIOS > > settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide1: BM-DMA at 0xfc08-0xfc0f, BIOS > > settings: hdc:DMA, hdd:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ICH5-SATA: IDE controller at PCI slot > > 00:1f.2 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ICH5-SATA: chipset revision 2 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ICH5-SATA: 100% native mode on irq 5 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide2: BM-DMA at 0xef90-0xef97, BIOS > > settings: hde:DMA, hdf:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide3: BM-DMA at 0xef98-0xef9f, BIOS > > settings: hdg:pio, hdh:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: PDC20269: IDE controller at PCI slot > > 03:0c.0 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: PDC20269: chipset revision 2 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: PDC20269: not 100% native mode: will > > probe irqs later > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: PDC20269: ROM enabled at 0xf7ee0000 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide4: BM-DMA at 0xdf60-0xdf67, BIOS > > settings: hdi:pio, hdj:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: ide5: BM-DMA at 0xdf68-0xdf6f, BIOS > > settings: hdk:pio, hdl:pio > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hdc: PLEXTOR CD-R PREMIUM, ATAPI > > CD/DVD-ROM drive > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hde: ST3160023AS, ATA DISK drive > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: blk: queue f885bba8, I/O limit 4095Mb > > (mask 0xffffffff) > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hdi: IC35L060AVVA07-0, ATA DISK drive > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: blk: queue f885c450, I/O limit 4095Mb > > (mask 0xffffffff) > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: ide2 at 0xefe0-0xefe7,0xefae on irq 5 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: ide4 at 0xdf98-0xdf9f,0xdf96 on irq 7 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hde: attached ide-disk driver. > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: hde: 312581808 sectors (160042 MB) > > w/8192KiB Cache, CHS=19457/255/63, UDMA(33) > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.warn klogd: hdi: attached ide-disk driver. > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: hdi: 120103200 sectors (61493 MB) > > w/1863KiB Cache, CHS=119150/16/63, UDMA(100) > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: Partition check: > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: [PTBL] [781/128/63] p1 p2 > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: p5 > > > Jul 1 12:03:36 (none) syslog.info klogd: [PTBL] [7476/255/63] p1 > > > > Well, what the kernel is expected to do depends on the source and > > configuration, niether of which I have checked for this particular > > kernel. > So, no bug with 2.4, you just didn't try any further. Correct? Correct. > > >From the 2.6 hardware-summary: > > > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ata_piix;;;Intel Corporation;82801EB (ICH5) Serial > > ATA 150 Storage Controller; > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ide-scsi;;;Linux;IDE-SCSI emulation layer; > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: usb-uhci;;;Intel Corporation;82801EB/ER > > (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #1; > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: usb-uhci;;;Intel Corporation;82801EB/ER > > (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #2; > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: usb-uhci;;;Intel Corporation;82801EB/ER > > (ICH5/ICH5R) USB UHCI #3; > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;Unknown;IC35L060AVVA07-0;/dev/hde > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;eUSB;Compact Flash;/dev/sda > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;eUSB;SD-MS-SM;/dev/sdb > > info: /bin/report-hw: discover: ;;;ATA;ST3160023AS;/dev/sdc > > error: /bin/report-hw: Unable to find lspci. > > info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: Module Size Used by Not tainted > > info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: ata_piix 7940 3 > > info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: libata 36480 1 ata_piix,[permanent] > > info: /bin/report-hw: lsmod: xfs 513720 0 > > > > Note: The lsmod lines with ata_piix related modules are only there > > after manually modprobing ata_piix, but the ata_piix;;;Intel ... line > > is there both before and after the module loading. > > This is very strange. It seems that hw-detect does not load the module > allthough discover recognises it and it seems to be there. > > Are you sure you waited until the third hardware detection run before > you manually loaded the module. The module may not be available during > the first and second run of hw-detect. I waited until I came into the partitioner. That should be the outmost limit, if the disk isn't recognized at that time your'e out of luck. I then backed out of the partitioner and saved the logs to floppy, and then executed a shell, copied the logs to a directory on the floppy, and then manually loaded the module. Exit from the shell and then into the partitioner. Viol�, there was the disk. Succesfully partitioned the disk. Then saved new logs. Anders
