On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 05:40:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
As of kFreeBSD:
> a. kfreebsd -- easy!
> i. add it to the archive!
> - straight after etch release?
that's the matter of the discussion here, and it's not
up to the kfreebsd porters, but the ftp-master, who you
are speaking in the name of if I'm not mistaken. I see
strong opposition here, which I still do not undertand.
> - promote ging livecd?
I think it's already the case, it's documented on the
wiki pages about kfreebsd.
> - do a vmware-format image?
A Qemu image would be way more adequate IMHO. but
that's definitely doable.
> - update archive qualification page?
I'm still missing what's really missing from it,
except a couple of developers which is well not a real
problem.
> ii. intro and demos at debconf?
> iii. developer accessible machines?
They already exist. kfreebsd also has enough buildd's
(redundancy et al. a thing that not all official arch
have).
> iv. kfreebsd strike force?
it exists, look at the différent lists on alioth for
the *-bsd-* projects.
> v. piuparts or other automated testing infrastructure?
Oh that's new, I wasn't aware the official RC arch did
had such an infrastructure !
> vi. release consideration?
That's not required to be in SCC afaict, though I
reckon it would be great. But one goal at a time seems
reasonnable and IMHO it's not to be decided before
inclusion.
> vii. installation methods?
Ging works. Some GSoC were submited to port d-i but
maybe it was only for hurd and I'm mistaken. Again it's
not a big concern while it's not a released arch.
> ...and see who wants to sign up to help with the different parts and
> flesh bits out, and if there are any other ways to exceed expectations
> on each of the various points. But I don't know if that /is/ the goal
> you're going for overall, or if it's something different.
>
> Cheers,
> aj
>
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpRD0uGzzmhL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
