Your message dated Tue, 20 May 2014 12:59:10 -0700
with message-id
<camxh3qcca4acvz_ysfvk71ufrnkqd1f2v2qeojenkgkwufa...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line libldap2 only needs to be Priority: standard
has caused the Debian Bug report #264278,
regarding libldap2 only needs to be Priority: standard
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
264278: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=264278
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libldap2
Version: 2.1.30-3
Severity: minor
Apparently, the highest priority package that depends on libldap2 is
gnupg (standard). I don't think there is a reason, why libldap2 should
be important then.
Roland
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages libldap2 depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgnutls11 1.0.16-4 GNU TLS library - runtime library
ii libsasl2 2.1.19-1 Authentication abstraction library
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
The last version of libldap2 was still Priority: important, but it's
no longer built.
The new libldap-2.x packages have always had a lower priority, and
today libldap-2.4-2 is Priority: standard, so I believe this bug is
done.
thanks,
Ryan
--- End Message ---
