Hi Adalbert, thanks for providing debug output, and sorry for not getting back to you for such a long time.
> With 0.5.3r512-1, the log halts after the line "got delete for old > connection, ignoring.." for about 30 seconds. Then the process dies > saying "vpnc: no response from target". > > Within these 30 secs, tun0 does exist and the default route is set to > tun0 (that is what the commands "ip ad" and "route" tell me). However, I > am not able to ping or connect to hosts within the target network. > > As to the differences between the logs: I put them into meld and I do > see some changed and some additional lines of the successful attempt > (especially at the end), but I don't really understand what happens. > Probably you better have a look at that. The two logs look very similar indeed. I see traces of the NAT-T 03 commit only in r512, but I don't understand why the server suddenly sends the delete and then things just hang. Would you be willing to narrow this down doing a bit of bisecting? At http://fschlich.userpage.fu-berlin.de/vpnc/ I've put up amd64 packages for r465, r467, r469 and r472. Cou could try them in this order and tell me which one is the first that fails (no need for debug output or the like). Florian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
