I am not a C coder and even less a vpnc expert, but for me the diff between r449 and 450 does not look dangerous. So I had the idea that the bug might not have been introduced in r450 at all. Instead, it could have been fixed by one of the debian patches which were applied to the r449 debian package.
When you look at the patch files from snapshot.debian.org you will find that vpnc_0.5.3r449-3_amd64.deb contains more patches than vpnc_0.5.3r512-1_amd64.deb (especially 07_bug496718.patch and 08_bug640978.patch look "promising" to me). I guess you did not apply those debian patches to the debs you gave me for the bisect? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
