On Sat, 2013-02-02 at 01:18 +0100, Florian Schlichting wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 08:31:33AM +0100, Adalbert Dawid wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 01:09 +0100, Florian Schlichting wrote: > > > Would you be willing to narrow this down doing a bit of bisecting? > > > > > > At http://fschlich.userpage.fu-berlin.de/vpnc/ I've put up amd64 > > > packages for r465, r467, r469 and r472. Cou could try them in this order > > > and tell me which one is the first that fails (no need for debug output > > > or the like). > > > > I just tried them all and they all fail. So the critical revision must > > be between r449 (still works, just tested) and r465. > > Thanks for testing. I've put up r450, r451, r452, r455, r457 in the same > place, if you're up for a second round. > > Florian > They all fail, whilst vpnc_0.5.3r449-3_amd64.deb from debian repo still works. So, the bug was obviously introduced in r450.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
