On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 08:10 +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Olly Betts <[email protected]> wrote: > > One question, why the dummy transitional packages and the > > Breaks/Replaces? > > > > The files installed don't seem to overlap at all between the "2.8" and > > "3.0" packages, so it looks to me like they should be co-installable, > > which would make transitioning a bit smoother. Currently installing > > an application which depends on libwxsqlite3-3.0-0 will force > > libwxsqlite3-2.8-0 and any applications depending on it to be > > uninstalled. > Yes, the old and new packages are co-installable. The package > transition serves two things. > The first one is don't leave the old ones behind, but this can be done later. > The second was my compilation attempts of build-dependent packages. > Can't recall the exact problem and/or those may be addressed by > sourceful uploads of those packages. Thus if you insist so, I may > revert the package transition if that would help a lot. I'm not at my > Linux box, don't know how many packages are in affect. I recall three > or four only.
Hi, So I upgraded to the version in experimental. Now all the old versions of the reverse dependencies don't work. I think you either need to remove the libwxsqlite3-2.8-0 package, or you need a Breaks on the pre-transition versions of all the reverse dependencies. James -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
