On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Axel Beckert <[email protected]> wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + pending
>
> Hi,
>
> Axel Beckert wrote:
>> The change
>>
>> -       dh_auto_build -Ddoc
>> +       dh_auto_build --builddirectory build -Ddoc
>>
>> broke the info pages.
> [...]
>> But I suspect I just need to update debian/info accordingly, too.
>
> That was necessary, but didn't suffice. They even weren't build
> anymore. This was additionally needed:
>
> -        dh_auto_build --builddirectory build -Ddoc
> +        dh_auto_build --sourcedirectory build/doc

Thank you for helping on these issues I didn't notice.
I'm fine with these changes.

> I've fixed this and added some minor cleanups in this commit:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/screen.git/commit/?h=screen-udeb&id=4e3403d21fb6848b62cde55771f275d581dda239
>
> The changes are currently tracked in the screen-udeb branch on Alioth:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/screen.git/log/?h=screen-udeb
>
> Despite the libtinfo5-udeb is not yet available, I was able to still
> build the package. So I wonder if that "Fix blocked by 819397: Add
> udeb support to libtinfo5" is really correct/necessary. Because I'm
> tempted to upload this support with the next upload. (Planned to do
> one on Sunday, but didn't manage it.)

You can use "dpkg-deb -I <udeb>" command to check the built udeb.
I guess it depends on libc6-udeb and libtinfo5, which should be libtinfo5-udeb.

So it's better to wait #819397 resolving first.
Of course you can make a release without udeb support, since other
changes seems also has a long list already.

Thanks again for taking care of screen!
I'm a user for 10+ years.

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 17B3ACB1

Reply via email to