Hi Roger,
Roger Shimizu wrote:
> > Despite the libtinfo5-udeb is not yet available, I was able to still
> > build the package. So I wonder if that "Fix blocked by 819397: Add
> > udeb support to libtinfo5" is really correct/necessary. Because I'm
> > tempted to upload this support with the next upload. (Planned to do
> > one on Sunday, but didn't manage it.)
>
> You can use "dpkg-deb -I <udeb>" command to check the built udeb.
> I guess it depends on libc6-udeb and libtinfo5, which should be
> libtinfo5-udeb.
Indeed:
Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.22), libtinfo5 (>= 6)
> Of course you can make a release without udeb support, since other
> changes seems also has a long list already.
That's why I made these changes in a separate branch.
> Thanks again for taking care of screen!
You're welcome. :-)
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <[email protected]>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE