On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:34:45AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:12:15PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > Another possibility, which arguably is nicer for other non-Debian places
> > as well, would be to get upstream of libreoffice-dictionaries to budle a
> > newer version of that dictionary.
> 
> That could be done, but I'd prefer to make dutch build hunspell-nl anyway.
> Building hunspell-* from where they come from imho is preferred.
> 
> Here especially since dutch already builds a hunspell-needing dict in a
> myspell-nl package which should be fixed.

Sure, I wasn't asking against having src:dutch do it.

That said, be aware that the hunspell-nl binary built by
src:libreoffice-dictionaries has an higher version than src:dutch
currently has, so you'd need to take care of it.
Once you take over the binary from src:dutch I'll quickly update
libreoffice-dictionarie to stop building it.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to