On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 12:47:53PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Marc Haber: > > please flexibilize the output format. The current options are fine, > > but it would be nice to have more fine-grained control over output > > format. The current formats could be mapped into combination of output > > "atoms", with the current definitions being defaults. That way, a > > local admin could define their own formats. > > Would XML output be acceptable? Based on that, you could use various > other tools to transform the output to the format you need.
For me, it would be unuseable, since I have not yet found the time to grok the "various other tools" yet. But it certainly is a modern and buzzword compliant way to output data in a machine-readable flexible way. Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
