Hi,
On 19/11/2025 01:14, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Antoine Beaupré <[email protected]> writes:
Hey folks, so this has been flying about for a couple of months now,
what's the current status?
Is someone willing to own this bug and merge everything?
I might take some time to do so in a week or two if no one else steps
up...
I'd appreciate if you would review my WIP (which I finally pushed). In
particular, I'd appreciate your perspective on that potential UX
enhancement and am wondering if there's a better way to do it and to
support upstream's efforts to make config migration less painful. The
obvious downside to upstream's current implementation is that it erases
comments in the config.
Could we track this in a separate bug report? This one is specifically for
discussing the maintainership of borgmatic. Thanks!
Would be a shame to leave borgmatic like this in Debian! :)
Agreed.
And thank you for people for all the NMUs, we're lagging, but not that
far behind upstream, thanks to that awesome work...
Would you like to be assimilated into the borg collective? ;) As Andrej
said, if you show up and do the work then you're part of the collective,
and the project is under the salsa/collab-maint group so you already
have access. I've been testing 2.0.9, but feel free to our package
forward to 2.0.11 if you prefer.
Cheers,
Nicholas
Greets,
Lee
