On Sun, Jan 25, 2026 at 03:20:06PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > Mass-filing reports doesn't mean that you are waived to provide necessary > > > information, at least some build logs. > > > > I already did but you missed it. Quote from the original report: > > > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > I've put recent build logs for all of them here: > > > > https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/202601/ > > No, the essential information for a bug report should be self-contained.
The essential information for *this* bug report is that binutils breaks a *bunch* of packages which build ok in forky but FTBFS in unstable because ld segfaults, and that information is already in the bug report. I provided a list of affected packages and (upon your request) an excerpt for one of them, plus one external reference in the upstream bugzilla. In this case, I believe that to be *more* than enough to consider the bug as RC, and I also believe that asking me for an excerpt for each of the affected packages is not reasonable, because there are too many of them and it would be a waste of bandwith. If you still disagree, I'm sorry but we will have to agree to disagree. Thanks.
