Package: licenserecon Version: 12.0 Severity: minor I run lrc -s on a package with good licensing hygiene, but I get this kind of output when it is dual-licensed and includes a copy of each license.
=========================================================== en: Versions: licenserecon '12.0' licensecheck '3.3.9-1' Parsing Source Tree .... Reading d/copyright .... Running licensecheck .... d/copyright | licensecheck MIT or Apache-2.0| Apache-2.0 LICENSE-APACHE MIT or Apache-2.0| Expat LICENSE-MIT Short option in use. Not all differences shown =========================================================== This is very common to have dual-licensed source, and to include two LICENSE files in the root folder (or sometimes LICENSE + COPYING) and licenserecon has read the debian/copyright and decided that these files conflict with it. When these files are present individually it absolutely does need deeper review, but when they're together in this way it is almost exactly saying that debian/copyright is correct. Thanks, Andrew McMillan. -- System Information: Debian Release: forky/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (499, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 6.19.6+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/24 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=en_NZ.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_NZ.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages licenserecon depends on: ii libc6 2.42-13 ii licensecheck 3.3.9-1 licenserecon recommends no packages. licenserecon suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Porirua, New Zealand +64 (27) 288 6741 Weinberg's First Law: Progress is only made on alternate Fridays. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
