On 09/03/2026 18:57, Andrew McMillan wrote:

I'll keep attaching them to this bug when I encounter them going
forward, if you like.

No need, one example is fine.

I don't see a bug here though. While the package source may be dual licensed,
the file LICENSE-APACHE is clearly Apache-2.0 licensed,
and the file LICENSE-MIT is clearly MIT or Expat licensed.

licensecheck and hence licenserecon are correct here.


I suggest, if this is happening a lot,
you could use a debian/lrc.config file in the packages,
that lists these two files as exclusions.

Reply via email to