On Fri, 2026-03-13 at 10:23 +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Peter Blackman <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > On 09/03/2026 21:09, Peter Blackman wrote:
> > > I don't see a bug here though. While the package source may be
> > > dual licensed,
> > > the file LICENSE-APACHE is clearly Apache-2.0 licensed,
> > > and the file LICENSE-MIT is clearly MIT or Expat licensed.
> > > 
> > > licensecheck and hence licenserecon are correct here.
> > 
> > While there is a genuine license difference being reported,
> > on further consideration, I agree its not a significant difference.
> > 
> > Will fix.
> 
> Great!  I also see this, but have ignored them via debian/lrc.config.
> 
> License texts are exceptional that warrant special consideration.
> 
> Generally speaking, license texts are NOT licensed under itself.
> 
> Compare the text of GPL-3.0 itself:
> 
>  Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies
>  of this license document, but changing it is not allowed.
> 
> Often license texts doesn't even carry any licensing information
> about
> itself, which makes the situation unclear at best, and at worst there
> is
> no rights whatsever to the license text.  Presumably a grant to allow
> copy and distribute verbatim copies of license texts are implied.
> 
> /Simon

While it is true that the license text is not licensed as the code it
refers to, in many cases the presence of a license text in a directory
implies the licensing of that directory.

The problem I am reporting is that the presence of multiple licensing
texts in a directory indicates that directory is licensed in multiple
ways, and so calling out the individual texts which match each of these
licenses is not helpful.

In cases where there is a license in a directory and it does not match
the license(s) asserted for that directory in debian/copyright is very
important.

Thanks,
Andrew

-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Porirua, New Zealand                                 +64 (27) 288 6741

      Don't engineer in a crisis.  -- Vint Cerf speaking on IPv6
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to