also sprach Danny ter Haar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.05.25.0737 +0200]: > Setting up mdadm (1.9.0-3) ... > Starting raid devices: mdadm: failed to add /dev/sdb to /dev/md0: Device or > resource busy > mdadm: failed to add /dev/sda to /dev/md0: Device or resource busy > mdadm: /dev/md0 assembled from 0 drives - not enough to start the array. > done. > Starting RAID monitor daemon: mdadm -F.
This is ugly, but only aestethically speaking.
> ARRAY /dev/md0
[...]
> md_d0 : active raid1 sdb[1] sda[0]
as Steve said: the device is busy, it's already part of a RAID.
It's questionable to me whether mdadm should start RAID devices on
install/upgrade.
> Definatly something "fishy" in _my_ eyes!
You setup looks weird. mdadm.conf contains /dev/md0 and you are
already using /dev/md/d0p6 (partitionable arrays).
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
"it is easier to be a lover than a husband for the simple reason
that it is more difficult to be witty every day
than to say pretty things from time to time."
-- honoré de balzac
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
