Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmm, I wonder if it wouldn't be better for dh_md5sums to generate an > empty md5sums file in this case to make it clear that it checked but > found no files that needed to be listed. > > Otherwise every other program that tries to use the information later > will need to check again. OTOH they probably need to check anyway since > an empty md5sums file also could be an error.
We do already have code that's supposed to check whether an md5sums control file is needed. It apparently isn't working right. (Naively, I would have thought that files in /etc would still have md5sums in the package? I'm probably just confused.) -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
