Russ Allbery wrote: > We do already have code that's supposed to check whether an md5sums > control file is needed. It apparently isn't working right. (Naively, I > would have thought that files in /etc would still have md5sums in the > package? I'm probably just confused.)
dpkg already includes md5sums for conffiles, so it's redundant to put those in the md5sums file (though dh_md5sums can do it if asked via -x). -- see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
