On Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:16:08 +0200, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The message will appear if the /selinux directory does not exist, see
>> 424011. Since it's harmless and easy to workaround, I downgraded the
> severity, but how about shipping the /selinux directory in the
> libselinux1 package to avoid further reports like this?
The directory is shipped in policycoreutils, which is an
standard package. this alllows people to turn off selinux, and not have
/selinux. Also, libselinux1 should not have non versioned directories,
so that libselinux2 can come around in the future.
manoj
--
A visit to a fresh place will bring strange work.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.golden-gryphon.com/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
