On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:55:53PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
> > > #. Type: boolean
> > > #. Description
> > > #: ../libpam-runtime.templates:3001
> > > msgid ""
> > > "One or more of the files
> > > /etc/pam.d/common-{auth,account,password,session} "
> > > "have been locally modified. Please indicate whether these local changes
> > > "
> > > "should be overridden using the system-provided configuration. If you "
> > > "decline this option, you will need to manage your system's
> > > authentication "
> > > "configuration by hand."
> > > msgstr
> > > "Някои от файловете /etc/pam.d/common-{auth,account,password,session} са "
> > > "променени от администратора. Укажете дали желаете променените файлове да
> > > "
> > > "бъдат презаписани и да се използват настройките доставени със системата.
> > > "
> > > "Ако откажете ще трябва ръчно да настроите PAM."
> > Hmm, I think it's a leap to go from "locally modified" to "modified by the
> > administrator". I'm not asserting that the administrator had anything to do
> > with it, because I don't know - it could be the fault of a rogue package, or
> > even an attacker. :)
> Hm, aren't these conffiles? Anyway, the original indeed does not
> suggest who did change them. Updated translation attached.
They're not conffiles. Even if they were, something other than the admin
could have edited them (which would be *bad*, but it could happen :).
Thanks for the update - committed to bzr.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/
[email protected] [email protected]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
