[Guillem Jover] > Couldn't we define a new virtual facility for xfs? There's been > other font servers in the past in Debian, and having to modify all > DM packages to add new font servers or keep track of new DM to add > to the font server packages do not seem optimal.
Sure. Have you seen <URL:http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts/DebianVirtualFacilities>? It describes how package maintainers could implement their own virtual facilities. > Could such a new virtual facility use the same name as xfs, or do > they share the namespace? Not sure, I must admit. $xfs or $x-font-server would probably work, but I would suggest the package maintainers of the x font servers come up with a name you could agree on. :) Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
