[Guillem Jover] > Yes I did, but was not sure if it needed approval from someone > before starting to use new ones. Maybe that could be clarified in > the page?
It is not yet determined, so not sure what to write. I will add a comment about asking the sysvinit maintainers, to allow us to provide feedback at least. I hope few virtual facilites are needed, and that we can reuse a virtual package name in most cases. :) > I'm not sure my question was clear. What I meant was that if the > namespace for the normal facilities and the virtual facilities is > the same (module the $) or if they are separete, allowing to use > stuff like xfs and $xfs at the same time. Ah, right. The two namespaces are separate (or actually, the namespace is the same and $ is significant). So $xfs and xfs are two different names. > I'll talk with the XSF about the name, anyway, but it would be good > to know what's allowed. :) Thanks. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
