On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, Modestas Vainius wrote: > Therefore, I will change 'gnu-v3' to 'auto'. Java will need to be implemented > separately (Cppfilt module supports any number of daemons). I wrote pattern > framework with 'java' in mind hence adding it will probably be only a couple > lines of code but I won't do it now.
Ok. > > Why do we need optional-pattern? Wouldn't optional work as expected? > > So we agree that it is not needed. > > So *@<version> is 'match-version' with implicit optional tag (we can't add > the > tag automatically in order to avoid it appearing in the diff). Yes. > > My suggestion was: > > (match-version)GLIBC_2.0 2.0 > > Will be done. However, in case of such syntax, 'match-' looks kinda > redundant. > What about: > > (version)GLIBC_2.0 2.0 > or > (symbol-version)GLIBC_2.0 2.0 > or > (symver)GLIBC_2.0 2.0 version is too generic... other possibilities: versionned-symbols, symbol-with-version Pick the one you prefer. symver at least seem refers to jargon and might be less confusing (and people who don't know will have to look up the doc). > Yeah. By the way, do you prefer 'regexp' (as it is now) or 'regex'? regex seems to be more popular and that's the name of the manual page as well, so maybe rather "regex". Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
