On Tue, Jul 20, 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> Given that the number of entries is unlikely to change, isn't it
> easier to use the current number of entries?
> The next time you need a new entry, you can reserve 19 more entries.

 I think it would be wiser to keep some buffer now if you're setting the
 value; but I agree it's unlikely we will use this space any time soon

-- 
Loïc Minier



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to