On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 07:35:52PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> Yes: upstream. The copyright file gives the author (sorry I didn't
> notice that before) but no indication of upstream. Also copyright
> files are not the obvious place to look for a maintainer, which is
> what I really meant.
>
> What I was really after on a web page was the upstream sources and any
> other resources (bug tracker &c.). Of course if any of these resources
> coincide with Debian (e.g. bug tracking) then the README could
> usefully say that. ("Debian-native" packages often leave one to guess
> their status simply from the information they omit, rather than by
> explicitly saying "this package is developed in Debian: here is that
> alioth development page; please file all bugs in the Debian BTS".)
They all coincide with Debian at the moment. I will likely set
up infrastructure sometime in the future, but I have other things
which should take precedence, including a Savannah project request
which has been languishing for two weeks.
If there's any intent to use posh outside of Debian, I might be
convinced to reprioritize.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
