On 30 June 2011 19:58, Clint Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 07:35:52PM +0100, Reuben Thomas wrote: >> Yes: upstream. The copyright file gives the author (sorry I didn't >> notice that before) but no indication of upstream. Also copyright >> files are not the obvious place to look for a maintainer, which is >> what I really meant. >> >> What I was really after on a web page was the upstream sources and any >> other resources (bug tracker &c.). Of course if any of these resources >> coincide with Debian (e.g. bug tracking) then the README could >> usefully say that. ("Debian-native" packages often leave one to guess >> their status simply from the information they omit, rather than by >> explicitly saying "this package is developed in Debian: here is that >> alioth development page; please file all bugs in the Debian BTS".) > > They all coincide with Debian at the moment. I will likely set > up infrastructure sometime in the future, but I have other things > which should take precedence, including a Savannah project request > which has been languishing for two weeks.
That's fine of course, but documenting it clearly would be a help. Maybe a minimal README? -- http://rrt.sc3d.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
