Hi, On Sat, Nov 8, 2025 at 3:35 PM Paul Gevers <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi riscv64 porters, > > ping. > > On 11/7/25 23:53, Christoph Berg wrote: > >>> Rather than this being RC for all architectures, I would say the > >>> proper "fix" would be to remove sbcl on riscv64 since that > >>> architecture is new. > > > > My argument is that the actual problem is that sbcl is now available > > on riscv64. If that architecture had not appeared, buildapp and > > pgloader (and sbcl) would not be buggy. > > > I don't like these arguments, although I understand them very much. I > was hoping that you'd see the commitment of being a porter to at least > have a look and report back, even if you can't fix it. sbcl is a > compiler, so at the root of a chain of things. In my humble opinion, > compilers that are part of testing on riscv64 should be higher up on > your list of packages to take care of. >
I do not know why I did not notice this and put this on my todo list, Thanks for the reminder this again, I or we(riscv ports) will have a look at this. BR, Bo > Paul >
