Re: Paul Gevers > On 11/7/25 23:53, Christoph Berg wrote: > > > > Rather than this being RC for all architectures, I would say the > > > > proper "fix" would be to remove sbcl on riscv64 since that > > > > architecture is new. > > > > My argument is that the actual problem is that sbcl is now available > > on riscv64. If that architecture had not appeared, buildapp and > > pgloader (and sbcl) would not be buggy. > > > I don't like these arguments, although I understand them very much. I was > hoping that you'd see the commitment of being a porter to at least have a > look and report back, even if you can't fix it. sbcl is a compiler, so at > the root of a chain of things. In my humble opinion, compilers that are part > of testing on riscv64 should be higher up on your list of packages to take > care of.
I am not a riscv porter. I care about pgloader :) Christoph
