Control: severity -1 important Re: Sean Whitton > > I just uploaded this workaround given the autoremoval was imminent.
(It wasn't imminent, I was mixing this up with another package, but whatever, the fix is ok.) > > Now I'm wondering what the correct severity of this bug should be, > > serious and reassign to sbcl? Important? > > Maybe important and assigned to both packages, given we don't know which > is really at fault. Makes sense. Christoph
