On 15/06/26 23:19, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 12:57:03PM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
See https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
for my rationale for not supporting /usr/lib/pam.d

If you don't want Debian to support /usr/lib/pam.d, then I think you
should at least revert all upstream commits that try to support
/usr/lib/pam.d; get dh_installpam to put the files into /etc/pam.d,
and get these packages fixed:

And given the centrality of PAM, please also seek consensus in d-devel@ about going against upstream instead of just fixing the Debian patch, for example by merging <https://salsa.debian.org/vorlon/pam/-/merge_requests/27>.

Regards,

--
Gioele Barabucci

Reply via email to