On 15/06/26 23:19, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2026 at 12:57:03PM -0600, Sam Hartman wrote:
See https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
for my rationale for not supporting /usr/lib/pam.d
If you don't want Debian to support /usr/lib/pam.d, then I think you
should at least revert all upstream commits that try to support
/usr/lib/pam.d; get dh_installpam to put the files into /etc/pam.d,
and get these packages fixed:
And given the centrality of PAM, please also seek consensus in d-devel@
about going against upstream instead of just fixing the Debian patch,
for example by merging
<https://salsa.debian.org/vorlon/pam/-/merge_requests/27>.
Regards,
--
Gioele Barabucci