On Tue, Jun 16, 2026 at 12:44:05AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > IMO, util-linux should revert the specific breaking change,
u-l -5 removed the usage of `include`, so `su -l` works again. However it seems we were "lucky" that u-l exposed this problem. Imagine other packages would have switched first, then we'd now have a lot more packages installing files into /usr/lib/pam.d. > I don't think it's fair to put pressure on Sam / the pam maintainer, > for something that had been clearly stated previously was not supported. I fail to see how resisting against PAM upstream is easier for us all than fixing the Debian patch that breaks the upstream feature, using a patch that multiple people tried out. Best, Chris
