Hey!
Just couldn't help but add my $0.02! For the M$ server products (NT and
2000), the initial release is always Service Pack 1. It seems odd to me
(not really, I just consider the source) that the initial release of a
software package has a service pack already. I would therefore state that
this is the WRONG way to be doing it. IMO, I think you should release the
initial potato as 2.2r0 (If nothing else than to NOT be like M$)!
Thanks,
Brooks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Wichert Akkerman
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Joey Hess
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Philip Hands
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Ben Collins
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Philip Charles
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Ben Collins
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Philip Charles
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Tomasz Wegrzanowski
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Martin Schulze
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Philip Charles
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Brooks R. Robinson
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Wichert Akkerman
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Jens M�ller
- Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication] Philip Hands

