Re: point release versioning [was Re: dedication]

[Ben Collins]

>  
> IIRC, the second release of 2.1 was called 2.1r2 to avoid the confusion I
> am in the process of creating.  We may mean the "r" to mean "revision",
> but many people would interpret it as "release" and so would see 2.2 as
> being identical with 2.2r1.
> 

But still, if we are going to make that assumption, then we should call
this one 2.2r1, and not skip the nomenclature. It's confusing.

-- 
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  --  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]