On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 7:29 AM Richard Hartmann <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 8:14 PM, Bastian Blank <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > While SHA2 is relatively cheep, it still takes a lot of time on the
> > given image sizes of 30GiB, somewhat between four and six minutes.
>
> This does not have to be part of the _build_ process, it can be part
> of the _publishing_ process.
>
> Out of interest: If you run the same build ten times, will you always
> have the same binary output?
>
>
> > Also I'm not really sure what you want to check with this checksums.
>
> The intention is to constrain images as much as possible to be able to
> tell if they have been tampered with, intentionally or otherwise. If
> we want to reproduce a certain scenario X time later for whatever
> reason, checksums help.
>
>
> > The image uploaded to the Azure infrastructure gets modified with an
> > additional header, so you can't directly compare the checksum.
>
> Is it possible to remove the header for checksumming purposes? Does
> said header enable any direct or indirect modifications?
>
>
> Thanks,
> RIchard
>
>

> Out of interest: If you run the same build ten times, will you always
have the same binary output?

You got last modified timestamps on files etc., so no :-)
-- 
Anders Ingemann

Reply via email to