On Sat, May 26, 2001, you wrote: > > 現在的問題是，做出來的 pdf 比使用 Type1(via ttf2pt1)的 ps 檔還要大！ > > 還要再研究、研究...，讓他不內嵌？ > > Really? how big? Following are some numbers I got (all in unit of 1000 byte): > > (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) > GB.tex 42 48 88 60 51 > larger file 2026 2353 2332 1232 757 > > (1) ps <= pk+dvips > (2) pdf <= pk+pdflatex > (3) ps <= pfb+dvips > (4) pdf <= pfb+pdflatex > (5) pdf <= ttf+pdflatex > > As you can see, when size is small, pk font (1 and 2) holds a slight margin > than direct ttf (5), and pfb font (3,4) gives biggest size. As file size > increase, the ones using pk font increase dramatically, the ones using pfb > font now becomes second best, while direct ttf gives a significant smaller > file. So in any case, direct ttf almost always gives the smallest size and > the best quality (at least one of the best).
Sorry, I didn't try big files. I will test it again. > Yes, there's no support for "slanting". I guess that can be added, not sure. > I do have a question concerning slant font, which has been in my head for a > while. The question is: does traditional (authentic) chinese typography ever > use slant or italic font? My feeling is that they're west only style. Any one > knows? BTW, does any one know a good book on chinese typography? How about this(but only concerning LaTeX): ``cwTeX 排版系統'' 吳聰敏.吳聰慧 著 翰蘆圖書出版有限公司(台北) ISBN 957-97454-0-4 can download from http://ceiba.cc.ntu.edu.tw/tmwu file name is cxbook.pdf ***** Oh, here is another email. :-) > From: rigel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [DOC] Poorman's Chinese Type1 font for CJK-latex > To: debian-chinese-list <[email protected]> > Cc: "Edward G.J. Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 23:47:31 -0700 > User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.13i > > Hi Edward, > Saw your email right after I post my numbers. I guess the size difference > might have something to do with your doc structrue. You seem have each > hanzi from each every subfont. A real document rarely like that. So direct > ttf might performe better under real world condition. Yes, I want to sure every subfont can use normaly. :-) I think that's why have the difference. Thanks. :) -- Warm Regards, Edward G.J. Lee（李果正） --*-- The best kind of learning is learning by doing. --*--
