On 09/05/13 at 10:05 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:10:25AM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote: > > even though most or all of Debian's public cloud images don't yet > > count as official by Lucas's definition > > Uh? Can you expand on why you think it is the case? AFAICT the EC2 > images should qualify as official images, ditto for the Azure ones > (although I'm less on top of their build process so I might be missing > something there). > > Either way, if we have criteria, it would be useful to go through them > as a sort of checklist and see who's in and who's out. > > FWIW, I've clarified with Lucas point (C) on IRC, arriving at a slightly > better version: > > C) the image generation tools are maintained inside Debian and/or by a > Debian team, using usual Debian recommended practices
Hi, We should probably have something like: D) the images most provide a user experience (in terms of default choice of packages, or of default configuration) identical to other means of installing Debian. Differences must be documented and justified. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
