Hi Zack,

Currently even the EC2 part of Amazon's build script pulls a specific
version of euca2ools from Eucalyptus's github site during the build
process. It also pulls a boto patch from Red Hat's bugzilla and applies it.
While none of this bothers me from a freeness perspective, it doesn't meet
Lucas's criterion (A) (about all software coming from Debian). I'm not
trying to make value judgments based on semantics here - clearly everyone's
goal is for all of the images, tools, and _if_ appropriate the official
criteria, to evolve toward happy harmony in the end.

Discussing this in an extended fashion as a tangent within a tangent of the
original thread topic is probably the wrong place for it, though. :) I'm
happy to report that I'll be attending DebConf13, and a non-DD colleague or
two from this effort at Google will be joining me. That seems like the
ideal place to get started on comprehensive progress bridging all the
relevant gaps.

- Jimmy


On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Stefano Zacchiroli <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 11:10:25AM -0400, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> > even though most or all of Debian's public cloud images don't yet
> > count as official by Lucas's definition
>
> Uh? Can you expand on why you think it is the case? AFAICT the EC2
> images should qualify as official images, ditto for the Azure ones
> (although I'm less on top of their build process so I might be missing
> something there).
>
> Either way, if we have criteria, it would be useful to go through them
> as a sort of checklist and see who's in and who's out.
>
> FWIW, I've clarified with Lucas point (C) on IRC, arriving at a slightly
> better version:
>
> C) the image generation tools are maintained inside Debian and/or by a
>    Debian team, using usual Debian recommended practices
>
> My objective, IMHO satisfied by the above criterion, was to make it
> clear that Anders' script totally qualifies.
>
> Cheers.
> --
> Stefano Zacchiroli  . . . . . . .  [email protected] . . . . o . . . o . o
> Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o
> Former Debian Project Leader  . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o .
> « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
>

Reply via email to