Previously Sven LUTHER wrote: > That is not comparable, X4.2 is still not in unstable because Branden > did work on 4.1 until months after 4.2 was released. This is one of the > things that gives us a reputation of releasing with obsolet versions of > stuff, and a think we have no reason to be prud of.
Actually I think it is a thing we do have to be proud of. Branden spend a shitload of time making sure we had a good working X in woody that works on all architectures, and he succeeded. We can probably safely say we have the only X that runs properly on eleven architectures. To me that is a lot more important than having a new upstream version of X in a release that might be a bit faster on a small subset of the architectures Debian runs on or has a few new features that 0.1% of our users use. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wiggy.net/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
