> On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 11:04:47AM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > Debian buildds. So just "doctoring" around a failure on a buildd by > > building it in a different environment is not healthy in the long run > > because we need to make sure that the buildd is capable of building > > every package.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 12:21:59PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > I guess it's a good thing that we don't have maintainers building and > uploading every single package in the archive (for at least one > architecture) built in random environments, then. > > Oh wait, we do. Damn. Do you have some reason to think that this is a problem? I mean, other than the <<we rely on buildd to deal with architectures where we have only one kernel and where we don't have maintainers spending much time>> thing that underlies your sarcasm? Thanks, -- Raul
