debian-ctte  

Messages by Date

• 2021/07/20 Processed: Re: merged /usr considered harmful (was Re: Bits from the Technical Committee) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2021/07/20 Processed: Re: merged /usr considered harmful (was Re: Bits from the Technical Committee) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2021/07/09 Next Meeting -- 14th July at 6pm UTC Sean Whitton
• 2021/06/28 Bug#990426: www.debian.org: Clarify status of list of old TC decisions Sean Whitton
• 2021/06/07 Next Meeting - 9th June at 6pm UTC Sean Whitton
• 2021/05/12 Bug#976462: marked as done (tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not?) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2021/05/09 Next Meeting - May 12th at 6pm UTC Sean Whitton
• 2021/04/10 Next Meeting - April 14th at 6pm UTC Sean Whitton
• 2021/03/23 Bug#976462: debian bug 976462 Mark Wielaard
• 2021/03/17 Bug#975075: marked as done (tech-ctte: Should NetworkManager support elogind?) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2021/03/17 Bug#975075: Closing as this has been resolved without the TC needing to intervene Margarita Manterola
• 2021/03/17 Bug#985270: marked as done (Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2021/03/17 Bug#976462: debian bug 976462 Sean Whitton
• 2021/03/17 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Simon McVittie
• 2021/03/16 Next Meeting - March 17th at 18:00 UTC (tomorrow) Margarita Manterola
• 2021/03/16 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Christoph Berg
• 2021/03/16 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Niko Tyni
• 2021/03/15 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Elana Hashman
• 2021/03/15 Re: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Elana Hashman
• 2021/03/15 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Gunnar Wolf
• 2021/03/15 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Sean Whitton
• 2021/03/15 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Sean Whitton
• 2021/03/15 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Christoph Berg
• 2021/03/15 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair David Bremner
• 2021/03/15 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Margarita Manterola
• 2021/03/15 Bug#985270: Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Margarita Manterola
• 2021/03/15 Resignation + Call for votes for new Chair Margarita Manterola
• 2021/03/10 Bug#976462: debian bug 976462 Mark Wielaard
• 2021/03/08 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sam Hartman
• 2021/03/08 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Elana Hashman
• 2021/03/08 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Matthias Klose
• 2021/03/08 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sam Hartman
• 2021/03/08 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Matthias Klose
• 2021/03/07 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sean Whitton
• 2021/03/07 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sean Whitton
• 2021/03/07 Re: Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sean Whitton
• 2021/03/06 Re: Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Josh Triplett
• 2021/03/06 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Jakub Wilk
• 2021/03/05 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Matthias Klose
• 2021/03/03 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Florian Weimer
• 2021/02/25 Bug#982987: Call for votes for new CTTE member Margarita Manterola
• 2021/02/24 Bug#982987: marked as done (tech-ctte: Call for votes for new CTTE member) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2021/02/18 Bug#982987: tech-ctte: Call for votes for new CTTE member Niko Tyni
• 2021/02/18 Bug#982987: tech-ctte: Call for votes for new CTTE member David Bremner
• 2021/02/17 Bug#982987: tech-ctte: Call for votes for new CTTE member Sean Whitton
• 2021/02/17 Bug#982987: tech-ctte: Call for votes for new CTTE member Elana Hashman
• 2021/02/17 Bug#982987: tech-ctte: Call for votes for new CTTE member Simon McVittie
• 2021/02/17 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Elana Hashman
• 2021/02/17 Bug#982987: tech-ctte: Call for votes for new CTTE member Gunnar Wolf
• 2021/02/17 Bug#982987: tech-ctte: Call for votes for new CTTE member Gunnar Wolf
• 2021/02/17 Next Meeting - February 17th at 18:00 UTC (in ~1 hour) Margarita Manterola
• 2021/02/10 Bug#976462: Bug#631985: Compress debug Sam Hartman
• 2021/02/07 Bug#976462: Bug#631985: Compress debug Sean Whitton
• 2021/02/04 Bug#976462: Bug#631985: Compress debug Josh Triplett
• 2021/02/04 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Jan Korbel
• 2021/02/03 Processed: Re: [Pkg-utopia-maintainers] Bug#981747: network-manager: NetworkManager does not start in sysvinit system Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2021/02/01 Bug#981582: release-notes: bullseye to be the last release to support non-merged /usr layout Andrei POPESCU
• 2021/02/01 Bug#978636: marked as done (move to merged-usr-only?) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2021/02/01 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
• 2021/02/01 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Marco d'Itri
• 2021/02/01 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Adam Borowski
• 2021/02/01 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? David Bremner
• 2021/02/01 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Margarita Manterola
• 2021/01/31 Bug#975381: marked as done (Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2021/01/31 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Elana Hashman
• 2021/01/31 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Gunnar Wolf
• 2021/01/31 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Gunnar Wolf
• 2021/01/31 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Niko Tyni
• 2021/01/31 Bug#975075: analogies Simon McVittie
• 2021/01/31 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
• 2021/01/27 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Sam Hartman
• 2021/01/27 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Felix Lechner
• 2021/01/27 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Gunnar Wolf
• 2021/01/26 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Sandro Tosi
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Ansgar
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Felix Lechner
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Gunnar Wolf
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Ansgar
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Luca Boccassi
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Wouter Verhelst
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Philip Hands
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Bastian Blank
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Bastian Blank
• 2021/01/26 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
• 2021/01/25 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Bastian Blank
• 2021/01/25 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Keith Packard
• 2021/01/25 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Marco d'Itri
• 2021/01/25 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Adam Borowski
• 2021/01/25 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Simon McVittie
• 2021/01/25 Bug#976462: Bug#631985: Compress debug Sean Whitton
• 2021/01/25 quick input request: use cases for compressed debug symbols Sean Whitton
• 2021/01/25 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Sean Whitton
• 2021/01/25 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Sean Whitton
• 2021/01/22 Bug#971515: CTTE decision on "kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries)" Dmitry Smirnov
• 2021/01/22 Bug#971515: CTTE decision on "kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries)" Shengjing Zhu
• 2021/01/21 Bug#971515: marked as done (kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries)) Dmitry Smirnov
• 2021/01/21 Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Dmitry Smirnov
• 2021/01/20 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Felix Lechner
• 2021/01/20 Bug#971515: marked as done (kubernetes: excessive vendoring (private libraries)) Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2021/01/20 Next Meeting - January 20th at 18:00 UTC (in 2 hours) Margarita Manterola
• 2021/01/18 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Sam Hartman
• 2021/01/17 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Matthew Vernon
• 2021/01/17 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Andreas Henriksson
• 2021/01/16 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Russ Allbery
• 2021/01/16 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Matthew Vernon
• 2021/01/15 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Gunnar Wolf
• 2021/01/12 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Sean Whitton
• 2021/01/12 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Wouter Verhelst
• 2021/01/11 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Matthew Vernon
• 2021/01/11 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Mark Hindley
• 2021/01/10 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: non-systemd dependencies in non-NM packages Simon McVittie
• 2021/01/02 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
• 2020/12/29 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Matthias Klumpp
• 2020/12/29 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Marco d'Itri
• 2020/12/29 Bug#978636: move to merged-usr-only? Ansgar
• 2020/12/28 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
• 2020/12/28 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sam Hartman
• 2020/12/28 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Russ Allbery
• 2020/12/28 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Vincent Bernat
• 2020/12/28 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sam Hartman
• 2020/12/27 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Bdale Garbee
• 2020/12/27 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Russ Allbery
• 2020/12/27 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? gregor herrmann
• 2020/12/27 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
• 2020/12/27 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Wouter Verhelst
• 2020/12/27 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sam Hartman
• 2020/12/26 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Wouter Verhelst
• 2020/12/24 Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation Andreas Metzler
• 2020/12/23 Processed: retitle 975075 to tech-ctte: Should NetworkManager support elogind? Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2020/12/23 Processed: retitle 975075 to Should NetworkManager support elogind? Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2020/12/23 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Mark Hindley
• 2020/12/23 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Ian Jackson
• 2020/12/23 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
• 2020/12/21 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Elana Hashman
• 2020/12/18 Re: Additional TC meeting before next one Margarita Manterola
• 2020/12/16 Re: Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? lorenzo
• 2020/12/16 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Philip Hands
• 2020/12/16 Additional TC meeting before next one Margarita Manterola
• 2020/12/16 Next Meeting - December 16th at 18:00 UTC (in 1.5 hours) Margarita Manterola
• 2020/12/16 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Ansgar
• 2020/12/16 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sam Hartman
• 2020/12/16 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
• 2020/12/16 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
• 2020/12/16 Re: Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Philip Hands
• 2020/12/16 Re: Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? lorenzo
• 2020/12/15 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sam Hartman
• 2020/12/15 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Vincent Bernat
• 2020/12/15 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
• 2020/12/15 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Mark Hindley
• 2020/12/15 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Mark Hindley
• 2020/12/15 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
• 2020/12/14 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Philip Hands
• 2020/12/14 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Sean Whitton
• 2020/12/14 Processed: Re: Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation Debian Bug Tracking System
• 2020/12/14 Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation Sean Whitton
• 2020/12/14 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
• 2020/12/14 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
• 2020/12/13 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
• 2020/12/05 Bug#976462: tech-ctte: Should dbgsym files be compressed via objcopy --compress-debug-section or not? Niels Thykier
• 2020/12/01 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Mark Hindley
• 2020/11/30 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Josh Triplett
• 2020/11/30 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
• 2020/11/30 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Mark Hindley
• 2020/11/29 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
• 2020/11/29 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
• 2020/11/29 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
• 2020/11/29 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
• 2020/11/29 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
• 2020/11/22 Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Tollef Fog Heen
• 2020/11/21 Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Philip Hands
• 2020/11/21 Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Tollef Fog Heen
• 2020/11/21 Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation Stephan Lachnit
• 2020/11/21 Bug#971515: Janos LENART
• 2020/11/21 Bug#975381: Subject: libinih: drop Debian's custom vendorisation Yangfl
• 2020/11/21 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Simon McVittie
• 2020/11/21 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Vincent Bernat
• 2020/11/21 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Wouter Verhelst
• 2020/11/20 Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Jonathan Carter
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Elana Hashman
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Tianon Gravi
• 2020/11/19 Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Josh Triplett
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Josh Triplett
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: Josh Triplett
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Josh Triplett
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Sean Whitton
• 2020/11/19 Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Shengjing Zhu
• 2020/11/19 Bug#971515: Status as of last tech-ctte meeting Ian Jackson
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Felix Lechner
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Ian Jackson
• 2020/11/19 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Matthew Vernon
• 2020/11/18 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Josh Triplett
• 2020/11/18 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Philipp Kern
• 2020/11/18 Bug#975075: tech-ctte: Should maintainers be able to block init compatibility changes? Felix Lechner

• Earlier messages