> > (and not in -devel, at least for the first round) > > Now that's kind of bizarre. You're planning to go to -devel *after* > having gone to the technical committee? I guess you're not actually > expecting the technical committee to make a ruling on it, or you're just > going to ignore it if it's one you don't like?
Hmmm, sorry for not having been clear. No, I don't want to go to -devel if -ctte comittee advice is not the one I'm "expecting". Honestly, I'm having hard times to make my own mind and I need help and "wise" advice on that issue. I personnally tend to favor the current choice of only one prompt, but this is definitely not a strong position. Up to now, advices I have collected all go in the same direction, especially from -ctte people. So, if nothing comes to go against this, I think that I will follow these advices and reinstate the confirmation to critical priority. Asking -devel would have happened *only* if the Technical Committe had been unable to take a strong position on this issue, for instance if advices had been shared inside the TC itself. Hope this makes it clearer....:-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
