Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: Bug#353277: ndiswrapper in main"):
> What's so different between my own non-free program and my own non-free
> card which requires a non-free driver to work with ?You didn't make the card. (Unless you want to argue that ndiswrapper is for helping hardware developers write their non-free drivers ...) > And we need ndiswrapper because our users can't completely control the > drivers that come with the hardware they have received or been given. This is an absurd argument. In particular, it would suggest that any non-free device driver should be allowed. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
