* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060227 20:33]: > > It is not clear to me whether a chairmanship schedule has been > > approved and if it has been approved what it would mean. Steve, as > > the current Chairman, should tell us what his opinion is. > > You, me, and Anthony voted yes on Anthony's proposed rotation; Raul voted > for the committee chair, did not vote on the proposed rotation; Bdale[1] > and Andi[2] indicated they were "ok" or "fine" with the rotation proposal, > but I don't see that this can be taken for a formal "yes" vote on the > proposal in question
My "ok" is a formal "yes" to the proposal in question. > > B. `Requiring implementation': > > > The following draft resolution: > > > ] (2) Requiring an implementation of proposals > > ] > > ] So I propose we establish a rule that we won't make decisions on > > ] issues that aren't ready for an immediate NMU when we make that > > ] decision. > > > was proposed on the 15th of February by Anthony. Andreas, I, Raul > > and Manoj voted no (formally, Further Discussion). Steve and > > Anthony voted yes. With four votes against, the outcome is no > > longer in doubt and the resolution is defeated. > > My count of the votes: > > For: > > Anthony: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2006/02/msg00033.html > Steve: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2006/02/msg00035.html > > Against (FD): > > Ian: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2006/02/msg00036.html > Andi: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2006/02/msg00039.html > Manoj: http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2006/02/msg00059.html BTW, I think something similar should be done, but not as strict as in this resolution draft. But let's discuss about that seperate from voting details. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
