On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 12:14:00PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On 7/24/06, Bdale Garbee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >owner 353277 [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >owner 353278 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> These two bugs are about moving ndiswrapper and > ndiswrapper-modules to contrib. > At one point, I thought that we had been discussing that the > technical reason that ndiswrapper could not be moved to > contrib was that cipe depends on it. > However, looking at the cipe packages, I don't see any dependency > on ndiswrapper. > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/source/cipe > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/cipe-common > http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/pkcipe > Also, these packages haven't changed since > 2004. > http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/c/cipe/cipe_1.5.4free-9/changelog > So... those people who were arguing that cipe requires ndiswrapper > be in main, could you give me some hint as to what you were > talking about? I'm not aware that this was ever the claim. CIPE was cited as an example of a free NDIS driver that *could* be used with ndiswrapper; but the cipe packages in Debian are certainly not built for NDIS, they're built for Linux's native driver interface. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
